A new Senate proposal, the DATA Act of 2026, would allow large energy users like data centers to operate fully off-grid and outside federal energy regulation. While pitched as a way to protect households from rising rates, the bill raises deeper questions about lost grid capacity, accountability, and whether private power could quietly weaken the shared system everyone else depends on.
A new Senate bill could quietly redraw the line between the grid and private power.
Senator Tom Cotton introduced the DATA Act of 2026, a proposal that would let large energy users like data centers build fully off-grid power systems and operate them outside of federal energy regulation.
Under the bill, these projects could be set up as what it calls Consumer-Regulated Electric Utilities (CREUs). As long as they are physically isolated from the bulk power grid and don’t use it for backup, they would be exempt from oversight by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). No federal rate regulation, no reliability planning, no participation in regional transmission planning.
On the surface, the idea is straightforward. If a data center wants to generate all of its own power and never touch the grid, it shouldn’t raise electricity prices for everyone else.
That sounds reasonable. But once you dig in, the trade-offs get more complicated.
First, “off-grid” doesn’t necessarily mean harmless to the grid. Large, well-funded developers could buy existing power plants that currently serve the grid, disconnect them, and dedicate that generation to private use. Demand doesn’t increase on paper, but supply disappears. The grid still loses capacity.
Second, utilities have always played a quiet but critical role as the system’s backstop. They enforce reliability standards, maintain assets over decades, and ultimately deal with failures, maintenance, retirements, and decommissioning. With CREUs exempt from federal utility rules, it’s not fully clear who ensures long-term operational discipline once the grid is no longer involved.
The bill does keep environmental, zoning, and permitting requirements in place. But it removes the layer of ongoing energy oversight that has traditionally forced power assets to stay maintained, reliable, and financially accountable over time.
Utilities are understandably wary. Large loads have historically helped spread fixed grid costs. If the biggest customers go fully off-grid, those costs don’t disappear. They shift to smaller customers who can’t self-supply.
Off-grid development isn’t inherently problematic. In some cases, it can be an effective solution. The concern is when large, complex power systems operate entirely outside federal energy regulation, creating a parallel system with fewer guardrails and widening the gap between those who can self-supply power and those who remain dependent on the shared grid.
This feels like another example of how urgent demand growth from data centers is pushing the industry toward structural changes that solve one problem while creating new ones.
I’m genuinely curious how this plays out.
Is the DATA Act a smart way to shield the public from data-center-driven rate increases, or does it risk weakening the grid by letting supply, accountability, and long-term responsibility drift off to the side?
https://www.utilitydive.com/news/senate-bill-exempts-fully-isolated-large-loads-from-ferc-doe-regulation/809330/?utm_source=SolarWakeup&utm_campaign=a8bd6a76b6-SolarWakeup_2_182_16_2013_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5eaa0aab62-a8bd6a76b6-44309045&mc_cid=a8bd6a76b6&mc_eid=941cff91d0
Ready to Discuss Your Project?
Get your instant estimate or talk to our team about your legacy solar project.